meta data for this page
  •  

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
general:bioseqanalysis:genesetanalysis:busco [2024/02/14 14:24] – [Busco Results] ingogeneral:bioseqanalysis:genesetanalysis:busco [2024/02/14 14:24] (current) – [Busco Results] ingo
Line 95: Line 95:
  
   - <wrap important></wrap>If you want to look up the orthologous group behind a BUSCO group, you have to look up at [[https://v10-1.orthodb.org/|OrthoDB]]((see the example in the hidden section above)). For looking up a gene in the assembly, check the fasta files in the directory ''fragmented_busco_sequences''. You will find the deviating gene from your assembly there. Use its identifier to search in the web browser.<WRAP>   - <wrap important></wrap>If you want to look up the orthologous group behind a BUSCO group, you have to look up at [[https://v10-1.orthodb.org/|OrthoDB]]((see the example in the hidden section above)). For looking up a gene in the assembly, check the fasta files in the directory ''fragmented_busco_sequences''. You will find the deviating gene from your assembly there. Use its identifier to search in the web browser.<WRAP>
-<hidden YouArePatient?> 
-8-) You are patient?? Good, then let's wait for the fCAT analysis 
-</hidden> 
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
   - **Optional** repeat the analysis with the genome sequence as input, but :?: do you think that this makes sense for our purpose? Keep also in mind that BUSCO search in an unannotated genome sequence is computationally more demanding than the search in protein sequences((Why?))   - **Optional** repeat the analysis with the genome sequence as input, but :?: do you think that this makes sense for our purpose? Keep also in mind that BUSCO search in an unannotated genome sequence is computationally more demanding than the search in protein sequences((Why?))